|
The Supreme Court this week refused to hear a public interest litigation on granting paid menstrual leave saying it was a “policy” matter for the ministry for women and child development. Will paid period leave actually result in fewer women being employed? And where does the rest of the world stand on such leave? Read on...
The Big Story
Why such a fuss over paid menstrual leave?
Source: Feminisminindia.com
Ok, imagine this. Every now and then, you get a godawful migraine where the slightest sound or teeniest bit of light leaves you in absolute agony.
Would you go to work? Could you?
Or put it another way, would you expect an employee to report to work in that condition?
Now imagine, that employee is a woman, not one who gets the usual uncomfortable menstrual cramps but the one with acute pain—abdominal cramping, nausea, diarrhea, pain in the legs, lower back and lower abdomen, fainting, headaches--that up to 29% of women experience.
Would you really expect her to turn up to work?
This week the Supreme Court was asked to consider whether women and girls could take time off from work and school if they suffered painful periods. The three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud said it was a policy matter that should be taken up by the ministry for women and child development.
Filed by Shailendra Mani Tripathi, the public interest litigation came up for hearing just days after Spain became the first European nation to allow three days of paid menstrual leave a month and less than a month after Kerala’s higher education department said it would grant menstrual leave for students at universities that come under it.
“Looking around, and in my own house, I really thought the patriarchal approach and taboo around menstruation must come to an end,” Tripathi told Bar&Bench.
An old argument
Nearly half of those who menstruate experience some level of period pain, medically known as dysmenorrhea. For some, this pain can be debilitating.
[Find out more about dysmenorrhea, its causes and symptoms, here, here and here.]
Source: dhyeyaias
Dysmenorrhea strikes every month. If you use up your regular paid sick leave for it (in most places 10 days a year), you will (a) Still not have enough days off. And (b) Use up all your medical leave and have none left should you get any other ailment.
The argument against granting paid period leave is one that I’ve been hearing in different contexts for some years now: That it will result in a greater reluctance to hire women in a country where female workforce participation is already an abysmal 25.1% according to the latest Periodic Labour Force Survey.
Reluctance to hire women is what we heard when the workplace sexual harassment law was enacted in 2013 and front pages were filled with stories of how nobody would hire women because they were scared the law would be “misused”.
Then again when paid maternity leave was increased from 12 to 26 weeks, the same voices of doom proclaimed the end of women in the workplace.
And yet, here we are.
On the other hand, we do know the unacceptable cost women pay simply for bleeding. In the sugarcane fields of Beed, one of the poorest districts in Maharashtra, women workers are forced by contractors and even their own families to undergo hysterectomies to avoid the messy business of pregnancies and periods. A 2018 survey by the Maharashtra state women’s commission found a 36% average for hysterectomies in the district, as opposed to the national average of 3.2%, reports the website Feminism in India.
Period leave in India and abroad
The issue of paid menstrual leave has been raised earlier – in 2020 in the Delhi high court. Back then, the court had asked the central and Delhi governments to consider the petition for women government employees, including daily wage and contract workers.
In recent years, it’s also popped up in Parliament, most recently when Congress MP from Kerala, Hibi Eden said he planned to introduce a private member’s bill that includes paid leave as well as free access to menstrual health products.
Asia has been surprisingly progressive about paid menstrual leave. It’s been there in Japan since 1947. A 2014 government study found that less than 0.9% of women had actually taken such leave (let that sink in, all you who fear about “misuse” of such leave).
It’s there in Indonesia, in the Philippines, in Taiwan, in Vietnam and further away from Asia, in Zambia where it’s called a Mother’s Day and women can just call and say they won’t be coming to work – no questions asked.
India’s private sector seems to have caught on. In 2020, Zomato announced 10 days of period leave a year. Swiggy and Byjus also have a provision for some leave.
Among the states, Bihar announced paid menstrual leave, two days a month, as far back as 1992.
The silver lining around the debate of paid menstrual leave is this: Normalizing the conversation around menstruation.
Once a taboo subject, menstrual hygiene is now more routinely spoken with even a mainstream movie, Padman, about it. All over the world, access to period products is being seen as an urgent issue with the Human Rights Council in Geneva hosting its first ever panel discussion on menstrual health in June 2022.
Gloria Orwoba, a Kenyan senator campaigning to end shame about periods. (Source: BBC)
But some things are still hard to stomach. On February 14, Kenyan politician Gloria Orwoba turned up at Parliament in a white pantsuit stained red. The blood was fake since Orwoba wanted to prove a point about period shame. Clearly she succeeded when she was asked to go home and change. She went instead to a school where she distributed free sanitary napkins.
Weigh in: Should employed women be granted paid menstrual leave? Write to me at: namita.bhandare@gmail.com)
|